As for what rad decay works for- I am not sure.
He's very sure what it does not work for!
In this post Joe pastes in several links and paragraphs explaining radioactive decay
A three-billion year old rock needs to have its age determined by a radioactive clock that still has a measurable amount of the parent nuclide decaying into its daughter product after that long.
Yet he now claims that "rad decay" is good for nothing at all.
So when it suits Joe he can paste in evidence of how rad decay works, and it even talks about three-billion year old rocks.
And then when pressed on the issue he claims it works for nothing at all! It either works or it does not Joe! If it does not you can't use examples of how it works as evidence to prove your point! And if it does work, well you've just undermined your own point!
There's a word for people like you Joe G!
Still not thought of a single example where "rad decay" works yet Joe? Despite pasting in as evidence quotes from sites explaining how it works and what they use it for?
ReplyDeleteBwhahahahahah.