Original Post:
http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com/2010/05/shadowed-by-moronic-coward.html
Shadowed by an Obtuse Moronic Coward
-
Very flattering though- the lengths losers and poseurs will go to:
unitelligent reasoning- the title fits- OM is a classic case of being so dense he is a walking black-hole...
OM must stand for Obtuse Moron...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whatever Joe. The point is that you won't allow free comments at your blog. And this one does.
ReplyDeleteSo suck it up. Pretend it's peroxide.
It is a given that the comments you allow will not refute anything that I post.
ReplyDeleteSo have at it you obtuse moronic coward...
>> It is a given that the comments you allow will not refute anything that I post.
ReplyDeleteWhen you post something that makes a specific claim regarding ID I'll be ready to refute it.
Except you can't make positive evidential claims for ID because it's a vapid as you are. All you can do is demand evidence you would not be capable of understanding anyway.
I have made several posts that provide positive evidence for ID.
ReplyDeleteOTOH neither you nor anyone else has ever provided any positive evidence for blind, undirected (chemical) processes.
You can't even produce the methodology used to determine chance, necessity, matter and energy are all that is required to bring about life and its subsequent diversity.
IOW you are the coward and you are trying project your ignorance and cowardice onto me.
>> I have made several posts that provide positive evidence for ID.
ReplyDeleteWhy not write them up into a paper and submit the first ever peer reviewed paper that provides evidence for ID?
>> OTOH neither you nor anyone else has ever provided any positive evidence for blind, undirected (chemical) processes.
Auto-catalytic networks.
>> You can't even produce the methodology used to determine chance, necessity, matter and energy are all that is required to bring about life and its subsequent diversity.
Still waiting for that single fact about the designer.
>> IOW you are the coward and you are trying project your ignorance and cowardice onto me.
Darwinism won already.
Hey OM, play along with me:
ReplyDeletehttp://img709.imageshack.us/img709/1336/joegbingo.png
Very nice Rich. But you forgot "accumulated genetic accidents."
ReplyDeleteHey Kellogg-
ReplyDeleteAccumulated genetic accidents just happens to be the proposed mechanism of the theory of evolution.
>>>OTOH neither you nor anyone else has ever provided any positive evidence for blind, undirected (chemical) processes.
ReplyDelete>Auto-catalytic networks.
There isn't any evidence that auto-catalytic networks can arise via blind, undirected chemical processes.
>>>>>>> You can't even produce the methodology used to determine chance, necessity, matter and energy are all that is required to bring about life and its subsequent diversity.
>>Still waiting for that single fact about the designer.
Thank you for proving my point.
>>Darwinism won already.
Not by using any scientific evidence.
So how did it win, already?
>> There isn't any evidence that auto-catalytic networks can arise via blind, undirected chemical processes.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.springerlink.com/content/2014037622w7w127/
Wrong.
>> Not by using any scientific evidence.
Nope. So when you produce that first piece of scientific evidence for the designer ID is a shoe-in.
>> So how did it win, already?
By pushing the bleating of ignorant fools like you to the sidelines. And here we are!
There isn't any evidence that auto-catalytic networks can arise via blind, undirected chemical processes.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.springerlink.com/content/2014037622w7w127/
A link to an article about volcanoes?
How does that help you?
As for ignorant fools- you are the one who didn't know about radioactive clocks...
>> A link to an article about volcanoes?
ReplyDeleteYou can lead a horse to water....
Did you even read the abstract? It talks about "the result of photochemical formation in the plume itself according to the autocatalytic “bromine explosion” mechanism."
Do you think that somebody "intelligently designed" that mechanism? It's just one example of many.
>> As for ignorant fools- you are the one who didn't know about radioactive clocks...
Indeed, as I've documented already you thought there is a little clock in each atom that scientists can "examine" to see how old it is. Once you realized how badly wrong you were you went into a panic and started to quote people who know what they are talking about to rescue yourself.
I'll re-document that again I think as it was so very amusing.